|
Post by nikoligodbox on May 14, 2009 19:32:41 GMT
A new initiative has been created to displace the position of eHungry as top dog, for too long we have seen enations laid waste by this rampant imperialist monster. Now is the time to act: wupacc.ownforum.org/index.php
|
|
|
Post by chuikov on May 14, 2009 19:46:50 GMT
What's this? A reformists organization?
You're suggesting that we collaborate with capitalists to fight capitalists? We have our own means of conducting war not on the innocent, but on the guilty and fat, the capitalists. This warfare is being conducted through the economical hemisphere instead of fighting in the fields, accomplishing nothing.
|
|
|
Post by nikoligodbox on May 14, 2009 20:02:31 GMT
The first part of our task is the struggle to organise against the external enemy, world imperialism, and the second: the stage based on the socialist tasks at hand.
The first stage is that of the struggle against international imperialism, Hungry is the principal enemy, the most hideous, the most detestable enemy of the erepublik citizens.
This enemy, strong and armed to the teeth, always goes far in its offensive and daily increases its oppression. To fight it we must use the Leninist-Stalinist tactic of mobilising all possible forces, even the most insignificant, and using all our allies, however temporary and uncertain they may be. Without this we can do nothing to fight the enemy.
While it is regrettable that such methods are needed Hungry would rather drown the labor movement in a sea of blood than allow the proletariat to establish socialism by peaceful and democratic means. The Soviet Union Communist Party can attest to this.
Our alliances with capitalist or reformist nations are temporary but can only serve our final goal.
I agree that ours should be a fight that takes primarily on the battlefield, but at the moment there is no broad front in which this is taking place.
|
|
|
Post by chuikov on May 15, 2009 12:31:27 GMT
There is already an anti-imperialist workers' organization called the Workers' Militia. They share your belief aswell: our fight is on the battlefield. The Workers' Militia has not yet managed to play any significant role in the international socialist movement, even if they have 100-150 supporters. You can't expect to get more sympathizers through fighting in the field. It doesn't matter if it's eRep, players still seek cheap commodities and a goal in the game.
What we're witnessing, for the first time in the eRep Socialist movement now is the birth of sectarianism. Most of the economists on the Internationale agree that it's pointless to fight on the battlefield, at least under these circumstances and instead prioritize on the communes while the revolutionaries who desire to fight often focus their resources on combat instead of expanding their communes.
|
|
Duncomrade
Member of the Revolution
Yay!
Posts: 249
|
Post by Duncomrade on May 17, 2009 8:28:20 GMT
Hungry would rather drown the labor movement in a sea of blood than allow the proletariat to establish socialism by peaceful and democratic means. The Soviet Union Communist Party can attest to this. It is impossible for imperialist powers to massacre socialists or destroy our communes in eRepublik. Therefore, there is no need for socialists to waste resources in war. We are able to pursue our own economic development without interference from even the most aggressive capitalist states.
|
|